All news is rigorously fact-checked and reviewed by leading blockchain experts and seasoned industry insiders.
- Framework Ventures’ co-founder warns that US stablecoin regulations could weaken dollar dominance and push financial innovation abroad.
- The GENIUS Act may block foreign stablecoin issuers from the US Treasury market, limiting competition and stifling digital finance growth.
The latest stablecoin bill in the United States has stirred further controversy. While some say this is a calculated action to preserve economic stability, others view this strategy as more biased in favor of helping home financial firms.
Co-founder of Framework Ventures, Vance Spencer, even stated that by preventing access for overseas stablecoin issuers to the US bond market, this restriction would undermine the global dominance of the US dollar. Still, is that exactly the case?
I don't comment directly on regulation much but I would like to flag an emerging regulatory battle that is happening in D.C.
The soon-to-be revealed stablecoin markup apparently has requirements to shut off access to the treasury market to centralized international stablecoin…
— Vance Spencer (@pythianism) February 24, 2025
Why is the US Stablecoin Bill Controversial?
The measure demands the Treasury Department to investigate the possible risks of self-backed stablecoins and suggests a two-year ban on them. Simultaneously, the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is given more power to oversee stablecoin issuers, thereby maintaining the stability and control of the financial system, as we previously reported.
This control on paper appears appropriate. Giving the OCC complete authority allows the government to make sure stablecoins never start to jeopardize the economy. Critics have responded, though, since this control is also seen to restrict access for foreign stablecoin issuers to the US bond market, therefore compromising global financial ecosystem flexibility.
Political Influence Behind This Policy
Particularly during the Trump presidency, the crypto sector is currently rather aggressive in enhancing its political impact. Although opinions on the policy have been divided, the White House and Congress’s dedication to enact rules pertaining to digital assets is seen as a significant industrial step. After all, the sector now fits into the larger financial ecosystem rather than being only a technology experiment.
But with more stringent rules, one wonders: are political interests at hand, or is this truly for economic protection? Spencer thinks that this approach helps home finance groups striving to keep control over the market.
Tether Faces Political Pressure in the US Stablecoin Market
Similarly worried was Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino. He claims that rivals try to replace Tether from the US stablecoin market by using political ties.
Should this approach be followed, USDT—the most widely used stablecoin worldwide—may lose ground in the nation serving as the hub for global financial activities. Developing nations dependent on USDT for dollar-based transactions could potentially suffer as a result.
Furthermore, limitations on foreign stablecoin issuers could delay down development in the digital finance industry. Some experts even warn that this approach would encourage innovation outside of the US, therefore undermining American hegemony in the industry.
Regulatory Moves: Protection or Market Restriction?
Is this regulation really meant to safeguard the US economy, or is it rather a barrier to steady coin expansion? The solution is yet unknown. One is certain that this approach will significantly affect the way stablecoins are controlled and utilized in the next few years.
Furthermore, should the two-year restriction be maintained, it is not improbable that the market may seek substitutes outside the US.
