- Ethereum co-founder speaks on the commodity status of Ethereum as both SEC and CFTC make jurisdictional claims over the asset.
- It is reported that the Lummis-Gillibrand Act would define assets that are commodities and those that are securities.
The commodity status of Ethereum (ETH) has been a topic of discussion as the US Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) seek to claim jurisdictional control over the asset.
According to CEO of Consensys and co-founder of Ethereum Joseph Lubin, “the SEC has spoken” when asked about the security status of the asset. With this, Lubin was referring to the 2018 speech by former SEC Director Bill Hinman which removes Ethereum from the bracket of securities.
In the latest document, the former SEC director was severely warned about the impact of the speech as it could create confusion in the market when regulators decide to make a decision on the asset. However, he still made this pronunciation. Also, Lubin mentioned that the CFTC has on numerous occasions “spoken very crisply” about Ethereum being a commodity.
According to Chairman Rostin Benham, many cryptos are indeed securities, but the top three (Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether) are commodities. In his statement, Ethereum has been listed on some CFTC exchanges for some time, hence, qualifies as a commodity.
We would not have allowed the Ether futures product to be listed on a CFTC exchange if we did not feel strongly that it was a commodity asset.
SEC Holds Different Opinions on the Security Status of Ethereum
Contrary to this, SEC chairman Gary Gensler also argues that everything other than Bitcoin falls under security laws.
Many reports suggest that Gensler has had a double mind on the security status of Ethereum as some videos suggest he once thought the asset was security from his time as an MIT professor. Other videos also suggest that he thought Ether had moved from security to commodity by 2018.
With stablecoins like Tether, the CFTC Chairman also makes a similar claim.
Examining the circumstances around the Tether case, it was clear to our enforcement team and the commission that the Tether stablecoin was a commodity and that we needed to move forward, and swiftly, to police that market.
United States Senator Cynthia Lummis recently condemned SEC’s action against Coinbase, claiming the Commission has failed to provide adequate legal guidance. According to her, the Lummis-Gillibrand Act would have to be passed by Congress to come up with a “robust legal framework” to be worked with by businesses. The regulatory uncertainties are forcing some companies to move out of the United States to a more friendly environment.
It is worth noting that the argument between CFTC and SEC may come to an end once the bill is successfully put into action as it would define the digital assets that are commodities and those that are securities. It is reported that the bill would ban algorithmic stablecoins and introduce a requirement for stablecoin issuers.
Lubin finished the interview by saying that the commodity status of Ethereum is a foregone conclusion.
It’s really a forgone conclusion at this point. There may be a regulator or two in the United States that can’t bring himself to utter the fact that Ether is not a security, but I don’t know why that’s the case.
